Follow us on Google News
Get the latest updates directly in your Google News feed
Blake Lively found herself in the middle of unexpected legal drama, and the latest twist had everyone talking. Reports surfaced that she didn’t want to face Justin Baldoni’s lawyer in court, sparking speculation about whether her request would be granted.

Courtrooms weren’t exactly known for catering to personal preferences, but in Hollywood, stranger things had happened. Legal experts weighed in, breaking down what could happen next.
Blake Lively’s deposition dilemma: No easy way out
Blake Lively’s reported attemptto avoid facing Justin Baldoni’s lawyer in court is not looking good.
Legal expert weighed in, making one thing crystal clear:“That is absolutely not how it works.”Lively and Ryan Reynolds’ legal teamobjected to Brian J. Fredman personally conducting her deposition. Their reason was kept under wraps. When pressed, they declined to elaborate.

“A very materialistic person”: Hollywood Designer Exposes Truth of Blake Lively’s ‘It Ends With Us’ Outfits – $3000 Boots to Valentino Bag
But here’s the deal: when you file a lawsuit, you’re signing up for a deposition.“You can’t just say no, I’m not going to get deposed when you file a lawsuit,”the expert explained. It’s a standard legal process, and attempting to control who gets to ask the questions isn’t typically an option.
The bigger issue, though? This objection could signal“weakness, fear, or entitlement.”Courts don’t allow plaintiffs to pick and choose who interrogates them. The expert even joked about how unrealistic that would be:“Judge, can I have the first-year associate depose me?”

There are ways to limit aggressive tactics, like having a judge present, but the request to outright block Fredman from handling the deposition doesn’t seem likely to succeed. Unless there’s a history of misconduct, such restrictions rarely hold up in court.
Ryan Reynolds Spotted With Blake Lively for the 1st Time After Justin Baldoni’s Lawsuit and He Is All Smiles Despite the Fanhate
Bottom line: If you take legal action, you have to sit for questioning, no matter how uncomfortable it may be. And in this case,Blake Lively’s legal movemight’ve just made things even messier.
Blake Lively vs. Justin Baldoni: Legal battle heats up in courtroom clash
Things got heated fast in Manhattan federal court. Lawyers forIt Ends With Usco-stars Blake Lively and Justin Baldoniclashed over accusationsof sexual harassment, defamation, and a growing media storm.
Lively sued Baldoni in December, alleging harassment and a smear campaign. Baldoni fired back with a defamation suit, claiming he’s the real victim. Their lawyers wasted no time throwing punches – outside court chatter became a major talking point.

Things Get Worse For Taylor Swift’s Close Friend Blake Lively After Private Chat About Her Weight With Justin Baldoni Comes Out
Lively’s attorney called outBaldoni’s team for making“inflammatory extrajudicial comments.” Baldoni’s lawyer hit back, calling it a gag order attempt. The judge warned both sides: keep it in court or risk an earlier trial.
With new complaints, leaked footage, and even a website in play, this legal drama is only getting messier.

Heena Singh
Editor | Former Senior Writer
Articles Published :1457
Heena Singh is a Editor at FandomWire, spent the last two years making waves in entertainment journalism. With a knack for digging up blockbuster celebrity scoops and an uncanny nose for the latest buzz, Heena’s articles bring a fresh and fun perspective to life. When she’s not conquering writing challenges, you’ll find her curled up in bed, peacefully sleeping.